| If you are going to record and mix music on your | | | | specific to mixing music for video. If you do not have |
| computer and you want to get high quality results you | | | | any interest in working with video then there's really no |
| are going to need high quality "digital audio workstation" | | | | reason for you to go with Nuendo rather than Cubase. |
| software. Two such high quality DAW programs are | | | | The Similarities |
| Cubase & Nuendo which are both by made by a | | | | Not only do Cubase & Nuendo have the same |
| company called Steinberg and they both have a lot of | | | | audio engine (which means they have the same sound |
| similarities to each other. In this article you'll learn about | | | | quality) but they have the same layout. If you use one |
| how they are the same and how they are different | | | | program or another you'll be very much at home using |
| and which one is a better choice for your needs. | | | | the other one. Basically Nuendo is Cubase with added |
| For most people Cubase will be the better choice as it | | | | features specific for working with video. |
| has the same audio quality as Nuendo for one third of | | | | Both Work With Mac & PC |
| the price (the most recent version of Nuendo is sold | | | | One of the things I really like about Cubase & |
| for $1800, while the most recent version of Cubase is | | | | Nuendo is that they both work well with Mac & |
| sold for $600.) | | | | PC. This is unlike Pro Tools which works much better |
| What do you get for all of that extra money with | | | | with Mac computers (and currently doesn't work with |
| Nuendo? Well you get a lot of extra features that are | | | | Vista. |